0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.34	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.12/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:40:24 EDT 2024
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.21/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iZ1qhDa76q/E---3.1_22295.p
0.85/0.60	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.85/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.85/0.60	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# post_as_ho12 with pid 22374 completed with status 0
0.85/0.60	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.85/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.85/0.60	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# No SInE strategy applied
0.85/0.60	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SSSFFMNN
0.85/0.60	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 109s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# post_as_ho5 with pid 22385 completed with status 0
0.85/0.60	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.85/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.85/0.60	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# No SInE strategy applied
0.85/0.60	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SSSFFMNN
0.85/0.60	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.85/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 109s (1) cores
0.85/0.60	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.85/0.60	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.85/0.60	
0.85/0.60	# Proof found!
0.85/0.60	# SZS status Theorem
0.85/0.60	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.85/0.60	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
0.85/0.60	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
0.85/0.60	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_1: (a > a) > a).
0.85/0.60	thf(decl_24, type, esk2_2: (a > a) > a > a).
0.85/0.60	thf(decl_25, type, esk3_1: (a > a) > a).
0.85/0.60	thf(cEQP_1A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > $o]:(?[X2:a > a]:((![X3:a]:((?[X4:a]:(((^[X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5)&((X3)=(X2 @ X5)))))=(( ^[X6:a, X3:a]:(((X6)=(X3))) ) @ X4)))<=(X1 @ X3)))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X5))<=(X1 @ X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iZ1qhDa76q/E---3.1_22295.p', cEQP_1A_pme)).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > $o]:(?[X2:a > a]:((![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X3)=>?[X4:a]:(![X12:a]:((((X1 @ X12)&((X3)=(X2 @ X12)))<=>((X4)=(X12)))))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5)=>(X1 @ (X2 @ X5)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEQP_1A_pme])])])])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X14:a > a, X16:a]:(((((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X14))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X14)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (X14 @ (esk3_1 @ X14)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X14))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X14))|(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))|((esk1_1 @ X14)!=(X14 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))|((X16)!=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))))&(~(epred1_0 @ (X14 @ (esk3_1 @ X14)))|(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))|((esk1_1 @ X14)!=(X14 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))|((X16)!=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X14))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))|((X16)=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))))&(~(epred1_0 @ (X14 @ (esk3_1 @ X14)))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))|((X16)=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X14))|(((esk1_1 @ X14)=(X14 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))|((X16)=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))))&(~(epred1_0 @ (X14 @ (esk3_1 @ X14)))|(((esk1_1 @ X14)=(X14 @ (esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16)))|((X16)=(esk2_2 @ X14 @ X16))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|((esk1_1 @ X2)=(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((X3)=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((esk1_1 @ X2)!=(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((X3)!=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0))))=(esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0))))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0))))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_5])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > a]:((((esk1_1 @ X2)=(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((X3)=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ (X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)))=(esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)) @ X3))|((esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)) @ X3)=(X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ (X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X3:a]:((~((epred1_0 @ (X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((esk1_1 @ X2)!=(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|((X3)!=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0))))=(esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:a]:(Z0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_9])).
0.85/0.60	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_13]), c_0_14]), c_0_9])]), ['proof']).
0.85/0.60	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.85/0.60	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.85/0.60	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.85/0.60	# Initial clauses                      : 9
0.85/0.60	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.85/0.60	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
0.85/0.60	# Processed clauses                    : 63
0.85/0.60	# ...of these trivial                  : 3
0.85/0.60	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.85/0.60	# ...remaining for further processing  : 59
0.85/0.60	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 11
0.85/0.60	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.85/0.60	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.85/0.60	# Backward-rewritten                   : 2
0.85/0.60	# Generated clauses                    : 616
0.85/0.60	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 484
0.85/0.60	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.85/0.60	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.85/0.60	# Paramodulations                      : 593
0.85/0.60	# Factorizations                       : 5
0.85/0.60	# NegExts                              : 0
0.85/0.60	# Equation resolutions                 : 12
0.85/0.60	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.85/0.60	# Total rewrite steps                  : 127
0.85/0.60	# ...of those cached                   : 120
0.85/0.60	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.85/0.60	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.85/0.60	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.85/0.60	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.85/0.60	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.85/0.60	# Current number of processed clauses  : 45
0.85/0.60	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
0.85/0.60	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.85/0.60	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.85/0.60	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 36
0.85/0.60	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 423
0.85/0.60	# ...number of literals in the above   : 2053
0.85/0.60	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.85/0.60	# Current number of archived clauses   : 14
0.85/0.60	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 268
0.85/0.60	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
0.85/0.60	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
0.85/0.60	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
0.85/0.60	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.85/0.60	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 61
0.85/0.60	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.85/0.60	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.85/0.60	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.85/0.60	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 226771
0.85/0.60	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 229
0.85/0.60	
0.85/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.85/0.60	# User time                : 0.088 s
0.85/0.60	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.85/0.60	# Total time               : 0.097 s
0.85/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
0.85/0.60	
0.85/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.85/0.60	# User time                : 0.089 s
0.85/0.60	# System time              : 0.011 s
0.85/0.60	# Total time               : 0.100 s
0.85/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.85/0.60	% E---3.1 exiting
0.85/0.60	% E exiting
0.85/0.60	EOF